Second confession: I interview well not because I'm every company's dream employee, but because I know exactly what most companies want to hear, and I'm quite good at communicating those things regardless of if I agree with them or actually utilize them. In the past, employers have told me that I am an excellent interviewer -- and I know exactly why.
I didn't think much about my Teach For America application once I'd sent it, mostly because I was busy working and figuring out where else I could apply to. But a week or so after I'd applied, I received an e-mail letting me know that I'd moved on to the next phase of the application process -- the telephone interview.
I've heard it through the grapevine that some applicants get to skip the phone interview and go straight into a final interview, but I'm not entirely sure how this works. Some people have told me that if an applicant belonged to specific leadership groups or organizations, they'd get to skip the phone interview; others have told me that applicants with extremely strong initial applications are invited straight to the final interview, and that the phone interview means TFA is interested in you, but not quite "sold" on you for a final interview. I don't really know what's true regarding this -- all I know is that I was invited to sign up for a phone interview.

I scheduled my phone interview for a November date that I knew I had off of work, and immediately began looking into what Teach For America wanted to hear during this interview. I read articles and blogs written by those who were employed by TFA, by people who had conducted interviews in the past, by people who were accepted into the program, and by people who were not accepted into the program. I found a few sites that offered supposed real questions that had been used during this phone interview. According to my online research, the interviewer would apparently be asking me about a few key qualities: leadership and organization (both of which TFA believes helps to create strong teachers). I began to formulate responses that I typed up into paragraphs and bullet points on Microsoft Word, each response carefully organized into specific categories (organization, leadership, schooling, etc.) that I could easily get to during any point in the interview. My plan was to keep all of my well thought-out responses right there in front of me as I interviewed, to help keep me on point and prevent me from forgetting anything important. If I drew a blank, I could always just read directly from these paragraphs (as a writer and an actor, it's not difficult for me to read prose in a way that makes it sound like I'm speaking, not reading -- especially when I'm on the phone and not speaking with someone face-to-face).
On the day of the interview, I made sure I was well rested and that I'd eaten before the scheduled time, even though I wasn't overly nervous about it (at this point, remember, I was still in the dark about just how selective TFA actually is). I got my son off to school and then, upon arriving home, pulled up my Word document and awaited the phone call. (Phone interviews are always nerve wracking because of things completely outside of one's control -- if the interview was scheduled at 11:00, if 11:01 arrives with no phone call, you tend to start wondering what happened, if you got the date and time correct, if the interviewer can't get through for some reason, and, if so, just what you should do to ensure your interview eventually happens. Do you call someone? Do you e-mail? Do you wait?)
Luckily, my interview wasn't overly late (one or two minutes, at most). The woman on the other line began with pleasantries, and told me that the TFA staff who had looked over my application had been very taken with my statement of purpose. "It's really good," she told me (thank you, graduate degree in writing!), and then explained that they wanted to know a few more things about me.
True to what I'd read, organization was the first thing she wanted to talk about. How did I stay organized? What organizational tools or strategies did I utilize in my life? Truth be told, I'm not an overly organized person, but I was able to scroll through my Word document and begin discussing the categorizing and time management skills that I used every so often in my life (though I made it sound like I used them at least every day). Organization, I explained, was very important to me. This, as I explained before, is what makes me "excellent" at interviewing. I struggle with staying organized in my day to day life, but there was no way that Teach For America would know that during the interview.
This only accounted for part of the phone interview, though; the other part consisted mostly of discussing prior hardship and determination, and my responses in this area couldn't have been more sincere and heartfelt. I talked about being a single mother and finishing not only an undergraduate degree, but a graduate one too. I talked about being a Type 1 diabetic in a world that treats medical care like a privilege, not a right. And I talked about my son, who had struggled with behavior and academic issues in the past, and how we had used his prior labeling (by teachers among others) as fuel to propel him into advanced academics and exemplary behavior (my son, despite his early struggles, went on to become a GATE student, excelled in chess club, and was recently accepted into an accelerated magnet program for middle school students). I told my interviewer how often I'd turned "impossible" into "possible," and how hardship gave me motivation to succeed in the face of monumental odds.
I felt like I'd done a decent job in the interview, and found out a couple of weeks later that Teach For America thought I had, too.
Now, with most companies, a final interview consists of speaking with management in person so that they can decide if you're a good fit. At Teach For America, the final interview is a bit more involved (and mine turned out to be more complicated than most). Prior to the final interview, I had to watch a series of videos that featured a principal and a young teacher who had a monumental disagreement about something (I can't even remember what it was), and then I had to comment about who I thought was "right," how I would have handled the situation, and what I thought about basic professionalism and workplace conduct. Then, I needed to answer some questions involving some graphs (to prove that I had at least some skill in regards to data analysis, I guess). Then, I was able to set up my final interview.
I found out at this point just what would be required of me during this final interview. Apparently, it was going to be an all-day event with 6-7 other candidates, made of up three parts: First, I'd have to teach a lesson; second, I would read, analyze, and discuss an educational article with others in my interview group; and third, I'd interview one-on-one with a TFA representative. Needless to say, I began to research all three aspects of this interview so that I could be as prepared as possible, and then went to the Applicant Portal page to sign up for an interview.
Living in the Bay Area, I could sign up for a final interview in San Francisco, Oakland, or even San Jose (which would have been a bit far, but it was still accessible to me). I chose to interview in Oakland on a Wednesday morning in December.
There was one tricky element to this whole process, though -- I didn't know what my work schedule would be during the week of the interview, and so I was unable to schedule it in tandem with a day off. I went ahead and scheduled the Wednesday, though (as I had been instructed to sign up for my desired time and location quickly, lest it become full before I did), as I assumed that I'd be able to request the day off. I worked for a bank by this time, and management there tended to be pretty reasonable when it came to requesting days off, so long as I gave them enough advanced warning. As the schedule hadn't been written yet for that week, I thought that advanced warning wouldn't be an issue for this specific date.
As luck would have it, there were huge problems with that date. The very next day at work, I asked my manager about the date, and she immediately informed me that it would be impossible for me to take that day off (others, who had been working at that branch much longer than I had, had already requested that day off for various reasons). Too many people had planned to be out on that day, so I would definitely need to plan on being there. I thought briefly about simply calling in sick on that day, but decided against it because, at the end of the day, I didn't want to be unprofessional or leave my branch in an unfortunate situation. Besides that, I also didn't want to find myself unemployed when I still had no idea if Teach For America would wind up hiring me or not.
I rushed home that day intent on changing my interview date to a day that I could get off of work. I logged in and began browsing other times in Oakland ... only to realize that everything else had been booked already. My heart sank and I felt the first pangs of panic begin to set in.
It's all right, I told myself. I can interview in San Francisco. It's not that far.
I left the sign-up page for Oakland and began looking at times for San Francisco. Unfortunately, every interview time that I'd be able to attend there was also booked. With the panic inside me growing more abundant, I began searching for available times in San Jose, but found that it, too, had been fully booked already. I furiously began clicking through every available time in the state of California, determined to find one that would mesh with my work schedule ... and found one in Los Angeles.
Los Angeles. Clear on the other side of the state. It had one available slot on the one day I knew I'd have off.
I thought about this for all of two seconds, and immediately signed up for it. On some level, it seemed so impractical that I'd somehow buy an airplane ticket when I was already too broke to eat on a consistent basis just for an interview. But I knew that this interview could change my entire life, and it could lead to the career breakthrough I'd been waiting for. When would I get another chance like this? I'd come so far with it already. So I made a quick decision to attend a final interview with Teach For America in Los Angeles, almost four hundred miles away from home.
On the day of the interview, my friends Shirlee and Kathy (who had helped me out and bailed me out on more than one occasion since I'd arrived in California) kept Brendan overnight for me and offered to get him to school and back so that I could make it to my interview. I woke up at 3:30 to put myself together and make it to the airport for my 6:00am flight. I put on the most professional skirt suit I owned, complete with nylons and stylish wedge heels, pulled my hair up into a sock bun, and spent extra time on my makeup. I made it to the airport and boarded my flight on time, armed with two cups of coffee so that I could appear "bright-eyed" and "eager" despite my lack of sleep and rushed morning.
Upon arriving in LA, I needed to figure out the best way to get to the downtown interview location, so I asked around. There were a few options -- a taxi (stupidly expensive), a bus that would drop me off nearby (moderately cheaper), or a smaller, less conventional bus that would take all passengers to specific locations (much, much cheaper). I opted for the last choice, so that I could save money and be taken right to my location. This resulted, however, in me becoming wildly anxious that I was going to miss my interview, or otherwise be late (huge no-no). The driver seemed to drive us all over LA, stopping here, there, and everywhere for everyone else on the bus. My interview was at 9:00, and at 8:40 there was no sign that we were anywhere near to stopping at my location. Huge amounts of panic set in at that point.
I thought about speaking to the driver, but just as I was about to he stopped in front of a building and announced it as my location. It was about 8:50, so I quickly paid the driver and leaped off of that bus as quickly as I could in my skirt and heels. Then, with a deep breath, I entered the building and made my way to the suite where I'd be interviewing.
Two Teach For America representatives conducted the interview, both of whom had been corps members in previous years. They called me and seven other applicants into a conference-style room, and we all took a seat in comfortable chairs surrounding an oval-shaped table. The two interviewers -- a woman and a man -- took some time to talk to us about TFA and its mission, and what to expect should we be chosen for the corps. It was during this moment that I first began to learn about Institute, the five-week training session that all incoming TFA corps members must attend. The interviewers told us that it would be the most rigorous and, likely, difficult five weeks of our lives, but that it would be worth it because Institute was so effective. They told us how lots and lots of traditional teacher training programs were looking into using the Institute model because it was just so effective. They told us about how we'd be up before dawn and still up after midnight because Institute was so much work, but how we'd get first-hand teaching experience right off the bat. And did they mention that it was extremely effective?
The two interviewers didn't bring any kind of research or data to back up what they were saying, but I was sold on it anyway. From what they told us, it sounded like Institute through TFA was even better at preparing teachers than traditional programs were (because how could 4-5 years of intense training ever replace 5 weeks of intense training, amirite?). But anyway...
The interviewers announced that they'd begin the interview by watching us perform the lessons we'd prepared. "Does anyone," one of them asked, "want to go first?"
I knew how this was likely to go. All of us interviewing that day, being ambitious, ridiculously competitive "Type A" personalities (as most Teach For America corps members are), would sit around the table knowing it would be in our best interests to go first, but we wouldn't want to seem over-eager either, and so in the span of one second that would feel like one hour, each of us would wait for exactly the right moment until one of us enthusiastically shrugged and offered to be the first. And the rest of us would inwardly beat ourselves up, silently lamenting, Shit! Why didn't I just raise my hand?
Not me. Not today. I knew I wanted to go first, and I wasn't about to let someone take that opportunity away from me. I was determined that day to set a high standard, not live up to another standard that someone else set before me. So I immediately shot my hand into the air and announced clearly, "I'll go first."
I like to think that the interviewers were impressed that not even a microsecond passed by before I volunteered, but who knows?
I'd prepared a high school creative writing lesson for the interview. All of my research on this part of the interview led me to believe that it didn't matter as much what you taught, but how you taught it, and that you followed the very specific direction to keep it around 5 minutes long (which means that you're shooting yourself in the foot if your lesson is 3 minutes long, or 7 minutes long). I prepared a shorter lesson, knowing that, as a performer, I could convincingly drag it out if I needed to. My lesson covered descriptive language in creative writing, so I began by reading a bland statement ("I was sad") and asking my "students" to compare it with a more descriptive analysis ("My shoulders slumped forward and began to shake once I realized that I could no longer hold back the tears that stung the backs of my eyes" -- you get the idea). I then told the "students" that I'd be teaching them how to create more descriptive language in their writing. I did this by asking a volunteer to choose an emotion word -- happy, sad, scared, surprised, etc. I wrote that word on the board and then asked volunteers to throw out every synonym they could think of for that word (for the word sad, they'd call out upset, dismal, melancholy, sorrowful, and other such words). I wrote all of these words on the board, and I then instructed that, using paper that I'd passed out, each "student" would need to write a sentence describing that emotion -- but they couldn't use any of the words I'd just written on the board. They would do this, I explained, by thinking about what that emotion truly felt like, and communicating that through their writing. I then had each "student" share their sentence.
I think everyone had a good time with this, and enjoyed showing off their creative writing prowess. The male interviewer, though, tried to throw me a wrench by reading out a sentence that went something like, "I was really sad and upset when I found out my show was cancelled," essentially using more than one of the forbidden words on the board. I guess he was assessing how well I handled students who didn't follow, or else didn't understand, the directions. Having taught introductory writing courses in the past, though, I immediately responded, "That's a great start! I know you're feeling sad. But remember that the direction was that we can't use any of these words on the board -- it's hard, isn't it? Think you could try again?" Or something like that. He made a note on my response and we moved on.
I sat through the rest of the lessons (most of which were well prepared, but a few of which went too long or were missing key elements) relieved that I'd already completed mine. It made that section of the interview easier to get through, as I could participate in others' lessons without worrying about my own.
After a brief break, the interviewers introduced us to the next part of the interview. We would be divided into two groups, we were told, and given an article to read. As a group, we would need to discuss the article and possible solutions to the problems that it presented. My research on this part of the interview led me to believe that they wanted to see people able to engage intelligently and respectfully on an issue, while not dominating the conversation. So I did exactly that. In my group of 4, overlooked by the male interviewer, I contributed thoughtful ideas and suggestions and responded to some other people's suggestions, all the while being sure to not speak so much that others didn't get a chance to. Analysis and communication are areas that I take pride in being good at, so I felt pretty confident after walking away from that part of the interview.
We were released for lunch at that point, and told that when we came back we would be doing the final part of the interview -- the one-on-one conversation. I knew I'd be interviewing with the male interviewer, and he'd given each of us a reading to become familiar with over lunch. My reading had to do with a teacher who wanted to take her literature class to a Shakespeare production, but wasn't able to because the principal didn't think they had the funds to justify such a trip.
The first part of this one-on-one interview, interestingly, was a role play regarding the reading. I had to pretend to be the teacher, and my interviewer the principal. I needed to try to convince him that the Shakespeare trip was a good idea. This was actually kind of fun, and I enjoyed the back-and-forth reasoning between the two of us during this time. After this, though, he also asked me about the videos I'd viewed a while back (regarding the young teacher having a spat with his principal), and wanted me to elaborate on my answers regarding that situation. Lastly, he asked me questions about myself and why I thought Teach For America was a good fit for me.
One of the most important questions -- and answers -- I think, involved commitment. He asked me what, if anything, would cause me to leave the corps if I was hired. Again, because I know what people want to hear, my response was that nothing could cause me to quit. Once I'd committed to the corps, I explained, it would become a priority in my life. I think this is part of the reason I was hired. For anyone interested, it's important to note that (something I learned later on), one of the key elements that TFA looks for in candidates is grit -- or, in other words, a person's ability to persevere through extremely difficult and demanding situations. Those who run TFA know that they're throwing naive young adults into rough situations that they're not entirely prepared to handle, and so they want to make sure that each candidate they hire is -- or at least appears to be -- tough as nails, and not about to quit once things do (and they inevitably will) get really, really difficult. Anyone who is serious about joining TFA needs to know that.
But that, essentially, comprised the entirety of my final interview. It did last most of the day, but it was still light out when I made my way back to the airport. I was actually earlier than I expected, so I was able to arrange a switch to an earlier flight, and arrived home while the sun still shone in the sky.
I returned to my job at the bank as though nothing had happened. I warned myself to not get my hopes up. I even began applying for other jobs, back in the cycle I'd become so used to. But I knew the exact date in January when I would receive, by e-mail, TFA's final decision about my application, and I kept it in the back of my mind. When that date arrived, I spent my morning shift preoccupied and distractedly biting my fingernails as I tried to sell "solutions" to my customers.
The e-mail is probably there by now. What if I didn't get in? What if I did get in? I spent my entire morning navigating these thoughts and the emotions that accompanied them. And then (as these were the days before I began checking my e-mail on an iPhone), I rushed home during my hour-long lunch break to check and see. With bated breath, I opened my e-mail and began scanning the new messages, searching for one from Teach For America.
And then, there it was. Before I even opened it, I was able to read the subject title: Congratulations and welcome to the 2013 corps!
I wept. I wept because I had done it, and for the first time it seemed as though I'd come across a light at the end of the dead-end-job-and-low-wages tunnel I'd been lost in for so long. I had been accepted into a program which, as the New York Times once put it, harder to get into than "the nation's top law schools and grad programs." Not only did I have a career, but I was among the "best and the brightest" -- and this was not only relieving, but intrinsically validating.