My Other Writing

Chapter 5: Institute (Part 1)

With the contents of my apartment safely in storage and Institute closing in on me, I decided to visit my new school and meet my principal. Teaching in Vegas awarded me the privilege (as I thought of it at the time) of being assigned a teaching location without having to further interview. Other regions (including the ones in California, at least at the time) required all TFA teachers to interview with principals and be hired by them in order to secure positions for themselves. In Las Vegas, however (I suspect partly because the region was so desperate for teachers nearly everywhere), TFA teachers were simply placed in schools that expressed interest in having them. I did not meet or interview with my principal prior to being placed at her school. Therefore, I thought that visiting the school and meeting my principal before the start of the year would be a good thing. It would show "initiative," after all, and give me a heads up as to what my school and principal would be like. So I sent an e-mail to this new principal, asking for a convenient day and time prior to Institute wherein I could visit.

Though I didn't know it at the time, this new principal, Lilian Lawrence (not her real name), absolutely loved TFA teachers. Since taking over leadership of the school two years prior to the year I began, she had hired two of them and was supposedly quite enthusiastic about adding more of us to her staff. Based on what I knew about TFA, including my experience at Induction, I could only surmise that this woman loved Teach For America so much because it provided her with eager, high-achieving teachers who would deliver quality education right from the start. It wasn't until later that I began to suspect her love of TFA stemmed less from the organization's magical powers to produce great teachers, and more from the fact that TFA teachers tend to be young, inexperienced in the field, and much more willing to jump on board with high-stakes test centered "curricula" than an experienced teacher might be.

Despite the enthusiasm that Mrs. Lawrence's reply e-mail had relayed in regards to meeting me, she seemed stressed (almost frenzied, really) and rather supercilious when I met her for the first time. Granted, this happened during the last few weeks of school. There was likely much going on at the time. But she didn't meet my eyes when she greeted me. In fact, she barely looked at me at all during the tour of the school, which consisted of her leading me briskly, always a few paces ahead, through the four "pods" (4 wings of the building that housed classrooms) and introducing me briefly to two TFA teachers who had begun employment at the school that year. Ruby Walsh and Jordan Cunningham (nope, not their real names either) taught 2nd and 3rd grade, respectively, and Mrs. Lawrence had only wonderful things to say about both of them as she introduced us.

Overall, the tour was quick and not entirely memorable, save for one aspect. I remember Mrs. Lawrence stopping by a series of bulletin boards which were covered in graphs, numbers, and teachers' names.

"These are our data boards," she explained, with such emphasis as to impart that these boards were one of the most important components of the school. "We track all of our data."
She then looked at me expectantly, and I realized that, as she was looking for some kind of response, I had two options: 1) I could be completely honest and admit that I had no idea what school data boards were, what this particular data even referred to, or, therefore, how to interpret this data, or 2) I could stay silent and nod importantly, as though the data on the boards made perfect sense and I couldn't wait to start tracking my own.

In the span of about one second, I opted for the latter. Weighed down by the self-consciousness of not being a real teacher yet drove this response from me; once again, though, I assured myself that once I had completed Institute, the idea of data boards would make perfect sense and my recognition of them would no longer be laced with dishonesty.

Satisfied, Mrs. Lawrence led me away and I found myself leaving the school very shortly after I'd shown up. I left with a smile and my head held high, telling myself that I was excited to get started at this new school, but the truth was that I felt more than a slight twinge of anxiety -- anxiety over my teaching abilities, my lack of knowledge, my new school and its leadership, and just what I was about to dive head-first into. Again, though, all of this anxiety was fairly easy to push to the back burner since I still had a summer's worth of training ahead of me.

Still, I took some of that back-burnered trepidation on the road with me as I drove five hours from Las Vegas to the Los Angeles coast. Long drives give a person plenty of time to think, and although I tried to keep my thoughts focused on the bright future ahead of me, I couldn't help but ponder what I would do if I didn't leave Institute filled with preparation for my upcoming teaching assignment. Believe me, I became very good at pushing these fears aside as irrational and willing myself to trust the Institute experience.

Institute base was at Loyola Marymount University, located on the coast of downtown Los Angeles. Because of my status as a single parent, I was granted a family dorm -- meaning that, while nearly everyone else stayed in a one-room dorm they shared with a roommate, I got my own two-bedroom flat, complete with a kitchen, living area, and its own bathroom. Although Brendan was to spend the majority of my time at Institute with his grandmother or father, I did plan to have him stay with me on some weekends. Arriving on my own, though, the privacy and space were very nice. I bought some food for the kitchen area (in case I didn't want to go down to the cafeteria for meals or snacks), as well as some wine, and set my laptop computer up in the living room near a window with a clear view of the ocean.

So far, Institute wasn't so bad.

At check-in, I received some readings and a flash drive with work to prepare over the weekend. I also learned that a young woman named Michaela (not her real name) would be my CMA (which stands for corps member adviser) -- or, in other words, she was the seasoned TFA veteran who would guide me through Institute and teach me valuable things about education. Seven other new corps members and I made up her cohort, and she held some level of responsibility for us and our growth during Institute. She would help us develop a vision for our classrooms, assist us in lesson planning, and watch us teach so that she could offer feedback.

See, the big thing about Institute is that, after a week of learning all about planning and behavior management, corps members are thrown right into classrooms to begin getting first hand experience teaching. It's sort of a "learn as you go" approach, but it's also pretty watered down because each corps member only teaches for about one hour per day in a summer school environment (meaning that class sizes are generally pretty small). Corps members are assigned to a "collab," a group of roughly four people altogether, and then each person is given a subject to teach (such as math, reading, or writing). Then, corps members plan for that subject and deliver an hour (or so) long lesson each day. (When a corps member isn't teaching, other members of her or his collab are teaching, so the entire collab is responsible for a shared class.) All of this is done under the guidance of the CMA, and also a veteran teacher who sits in on each teaching session to assist with feedback and advice.

So, of course, I met my collab quite early on during the first week of Institute. I found out on the first day that I would be teaching summer school at Florence Griffith Joyner Elementary School (which many of us came to refer to as "Flo-Jo") in the neighborhood of Watts. On the second day of Institute, all of us loaded ourselves onto school buses and were driven to our schools so that we could do planning and training there, and this is when Michaela divided her cohort of eight corps members into two collabs of four people each.

My collab consisted of me, Athena (an older woman with lots of experience teaching, and yes, I used her real name!), Grant (a young man of Greek descent who had just completed an education-related, neuro-something-or-other, graduate degree at Harvard, and no, that's not his real name), and Desiree (a young woman fresh out of college -- not her real name). Athena and Desiree were both assigned teaching positions in California's Bay Area, and Grant would be teaching in Los Angeles. All things considered, we were quite the diverse group of incoming teachers -- the one thing that we did have in common, though, was that we would all be teaching upper elementary school (grades 3-5) in the Fall, and thus we would be sharing a 5th grade classroom over the course of Institute.

I'll note here that I was actually pretty lucky to be assigned a 5th grade classroom at Institute when I was going to be teaching 5th grade in the Fall. It makes sense to allow corps members the opportunity to practice teaching in a classroom similar to the one they'll be taking on for the school year, but this doesn't happen in a surprisingly high number of cases. I've talked to other corps members who were assigned to teach pre-K at Institute even though they would be middle school teachers come Fall, or corps members assigned to a high school science classroom at Institute even though they would be English teachers in the Fall. I happened to get very lucky that I was assigned to the exact same grade level/subject for both.

From what I remember, most of my collab were also going to be 5th grade teachers. Grant would be teaching science to a combination of 5th and 6th graders at a KIPP school (more on that later), and I think that Desiree was going to teach a general ed 5th grade classroom (like me). Athena, having had experience in education, would be a part-time teacher and a part-time assistant principal (yeah, I'm not sure how that one was supposed to work, either). All in all, though, as a group we had pretty similar goals in terms of learning outcomes, so we made a good team. Over the course of five weeks that followed after meeting my collab, I would become quite close with both Grant and Athena (Desiree never did become a willing member of our little Institute "family," though).

That first day at Flo-Jo, Michaela's entire cohort spent a good deal of time getting to know one another. We took a form of the Briggs Myers personality test (I think I was an INTP type, if you're interested), as Michaela thought that understanding each others' personality types would help us better understand each others' drives and motivations, and therefore help us create a stronger bond and develop a stronger team. We also took turns sharing our personal stories and backgrounds regarding why we joined TFA, and why educational equity was important to us. This certainly wasn't the first time that I wasn't entirely honest about my reasons for joining (see Chapter 1), but I enjoyed getting to be honest about my personal struggles. We sat outside at a lunch table as everyone shared stories that day, and I think we honestly did feel a bit closer after we'd finished. Despite all of our differences, the nine of us -- Michaela and her cohort -- could relate to the fact that we'd all experienced some form of hardship, and that hardship was part of what led us all to the same place at that table.

The first days of Institute wasn't entirely about building relationships and exploring ourselves, though -- we also spent quite a bit of time planning for the summer school classrooms that we were all about to teach. We went to lesson planning clinics, where we learned the basics of "I Do, We Do, You Do" (or, the importance of modeling a lesson and gradually releasing responsibility for it to the students). We learned about the importance of a classroom vision and tangible goals that students could work toward. In fact, Michaela required both of her collabs to create classroom visions that she then wanted to see come to life as we taught.

So Grant, Athena, Desiree, and I found ourselves wondering just what our "classroom vision" was. What was our vision, exactly, for our students? Aside from "learn things," none of us really had a clear idea.

What I would come to find out was that establishing a classroom vision (beyond "I want my students to learn things") is a huge part of teaching for Teach For America. TFA wants its corps members to come up with a vision that speaks to them, represents their passions and ideals, and contributes to student achievement, and then wants to see those visions happening when they enter classrooms. This is a beautiful idea, but not entirely easy to do when the ideas of what a classroom vision is and what one looks like in practice are vague, to say the least.

My collab and I were given copies of exemplar classroom visions -- ones that successful corps members had produced in previous years -- but we still found it difficult to come up with a unified vision and communicate it on paper. This was partly due to the fact that the vision was supposed to be partly about the classroom culture and partly about academic achievement. For example, we were supposed to make such declarations as, "By the end of summer school, students will meet ________ benchmark for _______ subject." The problems, however, were that 1) we had no idea exactly where 5th graders were supposed to be in any subject, 2) how 5th graders were assessed in these subjects, and 3) what the benchmarks were, how they were measured, or even where our upcoming students were at in terms of where they were supposed to be. When you don't know about these things but are expected to still, somehow, know them, it can feel pretty overwhelming. We turned to Michaela for clarification, but by the time we churned out a rough classroom vision, we (at least I) still felt very confused about many aspects of it. (I wouldn't actually understand and develop a strong classroom vision until my second year of teaching.)

As the first week at Institute proceeded, we were assigned a subject to teach (two of us would teach reading, one would teach math, and one would teach writing, and then we would switch it up halfway through the summer school session). I was assigned to teach reading, which, having had copious amounts of education in literature, I was absolutely fine with (I had yet to learn that teaching reading to disadvantaged grammar school children is very different than teaching literature to already educated adults). After this assignment, most of us were up well into the night developing and refining lesson plans that we would take with us the following week when summer school started. We were taught how to identify a learning objective for our students (using phrasing such as "We can..." or "Students will be able to..." or the ever-popular acronym for that, "SWBAT..."). We were taught how to focus our lessons around the objective, how to gradually release students into the work, and how to assess the work. We had to come up with most of the lesson materials, however (readings, worksheets, assessments, manipulatives, and other such things) on our own (which usually either involved hours on the Internet or hours navigating the supply lab provided for us at the university). Once again, when you're new to a field and presented with a bunch of ideas, practices, norms, and things that you're expected to know, but do not know, figuring everything out can be a long and frustrating process.

We struggled through, though, and came to a place at the end of the week that somewhat resembled minor preparation for our upcoming week of teaching. We'd take what we learned and use it, take what we kind of learned and try to use it, and try to forget about what we didn't learn. All in all, it felt like a huge exercise in, "We'll see what happens."

The weekend, though, was our time off, which gave us an opportunity to explore Los Angeles and its surrounding areas. There were beach parties and surfing; bonfires and S'mores; excursions to Disneyland and various clubs and bars. Athena, Grant, and I, did a bit of studying, planning, and eating together during the course of that first weekend, but in all honesty I spent most of it trying to relax while drinking wine and binge watching The Walking Dead on my laptop (this was one of those times when having my own room certainly showed benefits).

The end of the weekend, though, marked the start of the second week of Institute -- the week when we were to begin teaching.

This involved waking up before the sun, showering and putting myself together, and heading down to the main hall of the university where I could pick up my lunch and then eat breakfast (which was usually very nice, consisting of choices ranging from cold cereal, hot eggs, bacon and sausage, warm muffins, an assortment of juices and, of course, coffee). We would then need to be out front (usually right around the time when the sun was rising) in order to catch our school buses so that we could make it to our school sites on time. LMU happened to be rather close to Watts, so it never took long to arrive at the school site. The previous week, my collab and I had haphazardly (meaning, as best we could) set up our classroom. We'd moved desks around, set up boards, and put up as many posters as we could get our hands on, while at the same time doing our best to be conservative. At the end of Institute, we'd have to put the room back exactly as it had been (as is only respectful toward the teacher who used it during the regular school year), and so we didn't want to create a huge amount of work where that was concerned. Still, we had the beginnings of a working classroom that first morning of teaching.

All of the Flo-Jo teachers and their CMAs (and there were quite a few of us) met in a common room at the start of the day for morning inspiration, and then we parted to do last-minute preparations for our students. My collab and I wrote our daily objectives on the board and then paused for a quick photo of the four of us, in our classroom, ready to teach for the first time.

All of us went out to the playground to meet our students, nervous but bright smiles lining our likely overly optimistic faces. My collab had about eight students that day -- nowhere comparable to an actual general education classroom, but a good start, I suppose, for practice.

I'll digress here for a moment to point out that this happens to be another huge criticism of Teach For America (and particularly, its Institute training model). The students that TFA teachers serve are typically from underrepresented and underprivileged communities (all of my collab's students were from either Watts or neighboring Compton). Further, these students attending summer school to be taught by Institute teachers are struggling students (students don't usually attend summer school if they're doing well academically). These students typically need to catch up quite a bit before the new school year -- some of them, even, risk being held back if they're not caught up at least some. So, in other words, the students who come to summer school to be taught by Institute teachers are some of the nation's highest-needs children. They are the students most in need of a high-quality, experienced teacher who can understand and meet their needs. What they get, however, is a wholly inexperienced teacher who essentially uses them to practice being a teacher before being handed a classroom of their own. I'm not saying that all TFA teachers are ineffective at Institute -- that would be a wholly fallacious assumption on my part -- but I do think that there is some merit to criticizing the model presented.

Ask yourself this: If your own child was struggling to such an extent as to need summer school intervention, would you be happy if they spent their time all summer being taught by someone with no background in education (most TFA teachers don't have such a background, though some do), basically playing trial and error in your child's classroom while learning how to teach? It's worth considering.

Anyway, though, my first two days of teaching at Institute felt like a combination of performance (standing in front of an expectant group of people usually does, I think), crisis management, babysitting, a fair dose of "fake it 'till you make it" mentality ... and trial and error. The reading lesson I taught involved the book The Empty Pot, and we were to study various aspects of story elements throughout the week. A few of the students did very well and participated in my lesson, while others didn't seem to grasp the ideas I tried to relay (and, unfortunately, I didn't yet understand the concept of differentiation, or of finding new ways to teach the same thing). One student rolled her eyes at nearly everything I said. Another attempted to leave class in the middle of instruction. And another refused to do anything I asked -- she refused to read, refused to write, refused to speak, refused to move, refused to stand up. She stared at me defiantly until I pleaded with the presiding veteran teacher to intervene.

I was adequately prepared for none of this. Though I only taught one hour out of the day, and attended development sessions for the rest of the day, I returned to LMU feeling both physically and mentally drained. I believed that I had what it took to eventually be a good teacher -- I just didn't know what that would look like, or what it would take. So many things, from data keeping to behavior management strategies, still seemed so abstract.

On the first day back from teaching, veteran TFA corps members lined the LMU sidewalk to give us all high-fives and cheer loudly for us. We'd done it. We'd completed our first day of teaching.
On the second day back, I barely noticed that the sidewalk was absent of a cheer squad. Stepping off the bus, I was making tentative dinner plans with Grant when I turned my phone on (after a long day of, naturally, having it turned off) and noticed that I'd missed about half a dozen calls and at least a dozen texts.

All of those texts had the same ominous undertone. "Call me," they said. "Are you all right?" "I need to talk to you." "Where are you?"

Frowning, I told Grant I'd catch him later and hurried away to a quiet spot where I could listen to my voicemail. There was one from my dad that urgently requested that I call him as soon as possible. But the one that caused a deep sense of panic to rise within me was from my brother in law.

"Kate," it said, his voice breaking, "it's an emergency. You gotta ... you gotta call us as soon as you get this, okay? It's ... it's bad. It's really bad. ... Just ... just call me or Holly. Okay?"

I found an empty auditorium and entered it, my heart nearly beating out of my chest. A million possibilities ran though my head, but most of them centered around Brendan. The darkest corners of my subconsciousness knew -- just knew -- that something had happened to him. Was he okay, though? Hurt? In the hospital? Or was he dead? Had he run out into the street? Wandered off and gotten lost? Was there an accident in the house? Whatever had happened, it was obviously serious ... "really bad," as my brother in law had put it.

My fingers shook as I dialed my sister.

"Kate?" came her shaky, slightly anxious response.

"What happened?" I demanded. "What's going on?"

"Kate ... I have really, really, really bad news." I could tell she was fighting tears.

"What's going on?" I demanded again, sinking almost unwillingly into one of the soft theater-style seats.

"Are you alone?" she asked. "Are you sitting down?"

"Tell me it's not Brendan," I pleaded. "Just please tell me it's not Brendan."

There was a short pause.

"It's not Brendan," she assured me. "Brendan's fine."

It was as I released a huge sigh of relief, as nine hundred thousand of my million fears instantly dissipated, that she revealed, "It's Mom. Mom passed away last night."

Chapter 6: Institute (Part 2)

I don't remember much at that point, save for a tsunami of emotions divided into two parts: 1) Disbelief and 2) Relief.

Surely, I had misheard. My mom couldn't be dead. Perhaps she was in the hospital, or maybe she'd had an accident. But she couldn't be dead. My sister had to be exaggerating, or at least mistaken, about that.

Aside from those confusing feelings, however -- knowing that I'd just heard about the death of my mom, but not immediately able to render the news as valid and true -- another, dominating emotion swept through my mind and body. The news was bad, certainly ... probably one of the worst pieces of news I could have received. But it wasn't Brendan. Nothing had happened to my son, as I'd initially feared.

And for that, I felt relieved.

And for that, I felt guilty.

It wasn't for any of these emotions, in particular, that I cried. But I cried. I hung up the phone and, thinking I was alone in the small theater-like room I'd retreated into, lowered my head into my hands so that I could at least try to release the overwhelming emotions that had overcome me.

From behind me, a voice asked, "Are you okay?"

Of course I wasn't okay. I'm not sure that anyone crying by themselves is necessarily okay, but obviously someone cared enough to at least inquire. I stood up and turned around to see a young woman -- a fellow Teach For America recruit -- standing near the doorway. I told her what had happened, and she asked if there was anything she could do to help. Right around then, Grant also showed up. I'm not sure what caused him to come back looking for me, but there he was. And the two of them -- Grant and this unknown girl -- stayed with me while I tried to figure out what to do next.
Grant walked me to Michaela's Institute apartment, and I shared my tragedy with her. She made a few phone calls for me, and I found out that I had two options: 1) I could either take three days off of Institute to go be with family and process my mom's death, or 2) I could defer my placement for a year and return to Institute in 2014.

I didn't want to defer my teaching placement (not that I could if I even wanted to -- if I had, I'd be looking down the barrel of an entire year either unemployed or in another, short-term, low-paying job, and I couldn't do that to myself or to my son). So, instead, I agreed to take the three days off and arranged with my dad to fly out to Las Vegas that night. He (who had been divorced from my mom for years now), too, would be flying to Vegas that evening to help my sister and I make necessary arrangements and such.

I arrived in Las Vegas right around the same time as my dad, and he picked me up at the airport. He had gotten himself a room at the Trump hotel, and invited me to stay with him. Then we went to see my sister, her husband, their children, and, of course, my son who had been staying with them.
I found out during this time that it was the children who had discovered my mom on Tuesday morning, though they hadn't known she was dead. They'd apparently tried, unsuccessfully, to wake her up, and had reported to my sister that she wouldn't get out of bed. At first, my sister thought nothing of this and proceeded to make breakfast. It was only when she noticed that it was after ten in the morning, and my mom still wasn't up (when she was known to get up around sunrise every day) that she thought something might be wrong. She went to check on my mom, and could tell, before even calling for help, that something was, indeed, very wrong.

I can't imagine what that must have been like, and I'm glad it wasn't me that had to endure it.
My son, from what I was told, didn't immediately show emotion; rather, he put on a strong front to help comfort the younger children. But once I arrived, and he and I entered my mom's room to each choose a memento to take with us, he fell apart ... and so did I.

A part of me wanted to stay behind, even after the three of us -- my dad, my sister, and I -- had arranged the cremation and what seemed like a million other things, to help out and work through the complicated emotions I was dealing with. But another, larger, part of me wanted, instead, to return as quickly as possible to Institute and bury myself in my work.

And that's exactly what I did. Right or wrong, it's what I did.

For a brief time, the multitude of family drama that had long since been occurring in my family came to an end as we tried to come together and realize, in the wake of such an unexpected death, that nobody has all the time in the world to be alive. When you realize that everyone has only limited time in this world, becoming involved in silly drama seems ridiculous. (Still, that being said, I mentioned that these issues were only briefly solved because it wasn't long before some of those same family members decided to disown me yet again for whatever reasons they decided were proper -- I really can't keep track anymore. But I digress.)

With Institute already being so infamously difficult, it would be logical to assume that completing it would have been a huge hurdle for me after the death of my mom. In all actuality, however, I found finishing Institute to be much easier than I'd anticipated. I fell into a schedule and I think I was happy for the workload. I got up early every day, got myself ready, and walked down to the student center to get my box lunch. I'd then hop on the bus (or, more regularly, drive with Grant in his car) to Watts, teach a lesson, and return to LMU. I'd write lesson plans, revise lesson plans, and attend classes. And I spent lots of time, with Grant in particular, roaming Los Angeles and trying to keep my mind on positive things.

One weekend, I brought Brendan out to be with me. I didn't like the idea of him being alone in the apartment all day, hence the reason I opted to have him stay with my sister or his dad during the week (which I was privileged to be able to do), but on one slow weekend I had him come down and share my family-sized apartment with me. After all, he was the reason I had a family apartment to begin with, so it only made sense to include him some of the time. I took him to meals with me, showed him around LMU, and also took him to Universal Studios, where we stayed until closing and had a blast. Once the week was ready to begin again, I drove him back to the family member he'd be staying with.

My cohort and I, for the most part, stayed on the same page and taught our lessons at least somewhat efficiently, but there was at least one area in which we struggled at first: Discipline. We were not at all on the same page where discipline was concerned, and this resulted, predictably, in a lack of control in our classroom. We had major discipline issues among our seven (or so) students, including students who would get up and leave class arbitrarily, students who would talk back, students who refused to do work, and students who literally "shut down," refusing to look at us or speak to us at all. It was frustrating, to say the least. When I envisioned myself as a teacher, it was certainly not as a teacher with such a lack of control over her classroom.

All four of us knew we had to do something.

Athena, being a veteran teacher, suggested that we use a "stoplight" type of system. That is, all students would have a clip that started on a green board. If they broke a rule, their clip would move down to a yellow board and there would be a consequence. If they continued breaking rules, their clip would move down to a red board, and there would be a bigger consequence. Grant and I thought this was a good start, but Desiree was completely against the idea. She said that her teachers, when she was growing up, used something similar and she claimed it had done nothing but cause humiliation and resentment. Unable to come up with anything better, though, she eventually agreed to try it.

Despite her concerns about the stoplight, it worked very well. Once we established clear rules and followed through on consequences for breaking them, the behavior in our classroom improved tremendously. It was by no means perfect, but it wasn't the shit show that it had started out as.
Michaela noticed the improvement, too, though it didn't seem as though she was overly impressed with how we were doing in general. She relayed stories to us about her first year teaching, and how she'd been praised for her test scores. And we were subsequently expected to show how effective we were by coming up with assessments for our students and judging their progress based on them.

"What will your students learn," she asked, "and how will you know that they've learned it?" In developing our goals -- a huge aspect of being a TFA corps member -- we needed to understand our classroom expectations in terms of both qualitative and quantitative goals. At the time, I felt utterly confused and overwhelmed by this. The idea seems pretty straightforward, but I felt absolutely lost. I really didn't know what, exactly, 5th graders were supposed to know in the state of California, nor what our particular students were lacking in relation to that. I knew where they struggled in terms of the lessons I'd prepared, but not in terms of how they measured up to state standards (or, again, even what the state standards were). Thus, I struggled whenever I was asked to come up with metric goals or measurements. I know I could have found some way to look these things up, but I really didn't even know where to begin, and I was hoping this information would be given to me through the organization that was trying to help me become a teacher.

It wasn't. Without this information, though, I often felt like my lessons were a random shot in the dark, and my assessments, therefore, may or may not have been assessing necessary information. But they were still treated as wholly important.

Until this point, I didn't know just how dedicated Teach For America was to "the test." Creating data, analyzing data, and tracking data, however, would all prove to be some of the biggest factors in TFA leaders deciding how effective we were as teachers. I got my first taste of this during Institute when, after discussing tests and data with Michaela, we all had to spend a sizeable chunk of time entering whatever data we could produce into a database (that would never be looked at or used again after the summer, as far as I could tell). At the time, I didn't realize that this requirement (rather than being mostly an effective tool used to track our students, as we thought it was supposed to be) was really more of a primer for what would be expected of us once we had our own classrooms in a few months. So I did my best to create quality assessments, create quality rubrics to go along with them, grade these numerous assessments, enter data into the database, and pretend that I fully understood why this was all so necessary for summer school kids trying to get on track with basic skills.

I will admit here that, as a teacher, once you realize that you, the educator, are the one who will be judged on this data -- not the students themselves, regardless of the situations involved -- it becomes very difficult to grade assessments objectively. And when you're a new teacher without formal training, terrified of being judged unworthy to continue, you definitely don't want to enter low scores if you suspect that other teachers in your cohort might be producing higher scores. Assessments and data, then, become taxing and anxiety-filled endeavors that, at best, leave some teachers feeling like they are highly effective based on test data alone, and, at worst, leave other teachers feeling like they are the worst teachers that ever walked school hallways based on test data alone.

Aside from test data, though, Teach For America also used the TAL Impact Model to assess how we were doing as teachers. TAL stands for Teaching As Leadership, and the model assesses three things: 1) student outcomes, 2) student actions and habits, and 3) teacher actions.

In terms of student outcomes, the primary question was, "To what extent will students emerge from this classroom on a path of expanded opportunities due to major academic and personal growth?" In other words ... has the teacher significantly changed the trajectory of a student's life during the nine months they've been acquainted? Teachers were judged in one of five possible categories: 1) "No or limited growth; gap will widen," 2) "Typical growth; gap will not change," 3) "More than typical growth; gap will narrow," 4) "Dramatic academic growth," or 5) "Path changing and likely enduring academic growth."

In terms of student actions and habits, the primary question featured two parts -- the "Culture of Achievement" and "Engagement With Rigorous Content." For the former, the question was, "To what extent are students 'on a mission' toward a destination that matters to them," and teachers were judged, again, in one of five possible categories: Students were either considered 1) "Destructive," 2) "Apathetic or Unruly," 3) "Compliant and On-Task," 4) "Interested and/or Hard-working," or 5) "Passionate/Urgent/Joyful/Caring." For the latter part of this element, the question was, "To what extent are students engaged deeply with content and skills needed for success in this course and beyond," and the classroom was judged as either 1) "Not challenged; no learning," 2) "Passive or confused," 3) "Factual recall/procedural," 4) "Analysis/application/explaining," or 5) "Evaluation/synthesis/creation."

In terms of teacher actions, the question was, "To what extent is this teacher 'on a mission' toward a clear vision and constantly striving to operate as an effective leader?" Teachers were primarily judged on their ability to 1) "Set big goals," 2) "Invest in students and their families," 3) "Plan purposefully," 4) "Execute effectively," 5) "Continually increase effectiveness," and 6) "Work relentlessly."
During Institute, corps members sat down with their CMAs and discussed where they fell on the TAL Impact Model every few weeks or so. Teachers were asked to analyze their own practices and classrooms and judge themselves in terms of where they fell, and to justify their answers with piles of -- you guessed it -- data. How could you, for example, claim to be even a somewhat effective teacher when your assessment data doesn't back that claim up? Explain that assessment data. Explain these behaviors. Explain these parent comments. And so on, usually until the corps member finally came to terms with the fact that, under the TAL Impact Model, they were likely ineffective teachers producing little to no growth (I cannot, of course, speak for everyone, but this was certainly my experience).

And, quite honestly, seeing as how corps members step into inner-city classrooms with virtually no training in education or child development (other than what is provided throughout Institute, of course), it really is a bit unreasonable to expect that any of us would produce "life changing" results in five weeks. But this is the expectation that Teach For America laid out before us, and we knew that if we didn't achieve this goal at Institute, would would certainly need to achieve it once we had our own classrooms -- and all of us, I think, believed we could. Still, I did feel pretty bad that I was not deemed a "highly effective" teacher during Institute. It hit me pretty hard that I was not yet changing life trajectories in the classroom. My initial thought was not that it was unlikely for teachers at Institute to produce such results, or even that, perhaps, many TFA teachers simply didn't live up to the high standard set before them. My initial thought, rather, was that all of the other teachers at Institute with me were probably producing these amazing results, and I was one of the few who wasn't.

I know this now to be false. However, the only examples ever shown to us in terms of prior TFA teachers were the ones who did produce outstanding results as first-year teachers. We heard story after story about how effective TFA was, and how amazing TFA teachers were, and it honestly led us (at least me) to believe that life-changing, extraordinary results in the classroom was typical -- the norm -- for TFA teachers. Thus, even at Institute, being told that I was not, in fact, a life-changing teacher at that point was kind of soul-crushing, and my first real wake-up call.

Institute wasn't all about academics and data tracking, though. There was also a fair amount of discussion involving social justice and the issues impacting educational inequity. As I identified -- and still do -- as a liberal, an atheist, a feminist, and a definite "social justice warrior," I found these discussions to be important. I definitely wanted to learn more about the experiences of marginalized groups, especially within the context of education, so that I could take that information and hopefully use it to make me a better teacher.

In many ways, we collaborated and discussed lots of important issues. There were, however, frustrating aspects about these discussions in that there were times when I was left out of conversations, or my questions and contributions were otherwise ignored and brushed off. It didn't take long for me to feel like my voice was not at all valued at this particular table, or at least not as valued as other voices there. What I noticed over the course of a few weeks was that there were others who felt this way, too, and all of us were women. Now, I'm not saying that female voices were definitely more ignored than others during our social justice conversations, but it did seem to be a trend (at least, as I said, with myself and some other women at "Flo-Jo"). It's well documented that this kind of thing does happen to women in a variety of situations, and this piece from the New York Times reports that, in many professional and academic settings, the percentage of women in a discussion usually needs to be 60-80% before women are allowed equal time to speak (and also, men tend to perceive that women talk way more than they actually do).

What's interesting, and also frustrating, is that Teach For America is supposed to be an open environment dedicated to social justice in all areas. But this is a great example as to how, even when people and societies and cultures are willing to recognize racism and socio-economic inequality, many people still resist recognizing sexism.

I finally brought it up when, during one of our last days at "Flo-Jo," we were divided into two large groups and asked to comment about our experiences with these discussions. I was open and honest about feeling ignored and unimportant in a movement that we were all supposed to be collectively working together in. Though the other women who felt the same way I did nodded emphatically, and looked thankful that I had chosen to speak up, my words, in general, were brushed aside as fully as anything else I'd said in these group settings. (Let me point out that I didn't always feel alienated, and it wasn't everyone who resisted my inclusion, but it was enough to be very noticeable.)

The fact, which I had already known and better understood that day, was that there are times when speaking up about one's feelings of alienation only results in further alienation. That's what I felt happened on that day, and cried later, privately, to Michaela about how I wished I'd never said anything (which was hard, as I don't like to ignore my feelings either). She assured me that I was a very self-reflective person and should have spoken up, and that I shouldn't feel bad about having done so.

Still. As anyone who has ever experienced marginalization -- people of color, gay and lesbian people, transgender people, poor people, fat people, and on and on and on -- sometimes these things go straight to our core.

This issue, however, didn't mar my enjoyment of the last few days of Institute. Toward the end of the week, Michaela and some of the other CMAs from "Flo-Jo" organized a party in one of the CMA apartments, which featured plenty of conversation, drinking, and games.

On our last day at our school we had a fun day playing games with the students. We played basketball, jumped rope, played hop scotch, and created murals on the playground pavement. We said our goodbyes to our students. Each member of my cohort received a personal white board that had been signed by each of our students in permanent marker. Some of our students also wrote us notes, and one told me she wished that I could be her real 5th grade teacher in the Fall. And during this time, I began to wonder -- with all of my doubts about my instruction, academics, and assessments -- whether I had truly been ineffective in changing these children's lives. Perhaps I had done something for them, in some way, shape, or form.

Everyone at Institute -- the corps members, the CMAs, and everyone else involved -- celebrated when, after six long weeks, it finally ended. We had a huge rally outside LMU, complete with music, food, and congratulatory attitudes all around. After the celebration, Grant and I went for Mexican food and margaritas, and played a Family Guy drinking game well into the early hours of the morning. The next morning, I woke up early to move out of the family apartment that had become my home for the last few weeks, and load my car with all of the things I'd be taking from Los Angeles to Las Vegas. I helped Grant move out of his shared dorm, too, and we then went to lunch before parting ways -- he to a KIPP (Knowledge is Power) school in the heart of LA, and me, of course, to Las Vegas.

Institute was officially behind me. In all honesty, it felt like a professional version of a crash diet or a cram session. I'd entered Institute expecting to learn all the ins and outs of lesson planning, teaching, managing students, developing plans and goals, and understanding academic standards. I left Institute kinda knowing how to lesson plan, sorta knowing how to teach, with some solid ideas as to how to manage students, feeling completely lost in terms of goals, and still not knowing the first thing about 5th grade standards nationwide or in the state of Nevada. Even though I was beginning to feel very nervous about my level of preparation, I still held on to a quiet hope that TFA would still develop me into the stellar TFA star that I wanted to be before the school year began.

Despite the "Hell on Earth" reputation that TFA's Institute carries, my most difficult and trying days were definitely ... definitely ... yet to come.












































Chapter 7: Kick Off (Or, I am a Teacher in 3 ... 2 ... 1...)

Fourth confession: Part of the reason I didn't immediately fit in as an elementary school teacher was because 4th grade was the last time I was actually in an elementary school classroom, and I don't remember it all that well. I was about ready to teach 5th grade, and I never actually attended 5th grade. But more on that in a moment...

My start in Las Vegas, once I had completed Institute in LA, was by no means smooth. My son and I had an apartment to go to, but the moving company I'd hired to get all of my furniture and boxes from the storage unit in California to Nevada were much later than I'd expected. Thus, my son and I found ourselves sleeping on the floor of an empty apartment once we'd arrived, once and for all, in Las Vegas. Another TFA corps member was kind enough to lend me an air mattress, blankets, and pillows to get us through those first few nights, and I very much appreciated it.

The movers did finally arrive, though, and we began the process of moving in. We unloaded boxes, decorated walls, and set up Internet and cable access. Little by little, it began to feel like some rendition of "home."

There were still a few weeks before school started, but those few weeks were filled with events: First, there was TFA kick-off, the last meeting to feature the entire 2013 Las Vegas Valley corps, which would be a two-day meeting to help us transition from Institute to full-on teachers in our own classrooms. Also, I would be reporting to my school for a week-long introduction. During this time, I'd attend meetings and trainings specific to my school, and start setting up my classroom. Lastly, I would need to attend a three-day-long teacher initiation -- that all new teachers in Clark County had to attend -- at the Venetian. The week following that, we'd begin our journeys as teachers.

TFA kick-off was very similar to both Induction and Institute, filled with team-building games and teacher-building discussions, but there was also one major difference. During kick-off, we worked specifically with our MTLD (again, the leader who would work most closely with us during our first year as teachers and assist in our growth and development). Christy, my MTLD (again, not her real name) was a veteran teacher who had served as a TFA corps member many years prior. She would be working with a couple dozen of us corps members -- some from the 2013 corps, and some from the 2012 corps -- and, together, we would come to be known as "Christy's cohort." Each MTLD had a cohort of their own, but Christy's focused specifically on elementary school teachers from a variety of schools.

She would be our leader, our mentor, the person we went to with questions, the person we reported to ... for all intents and purposes, she was our TFA "boss." We had to answer to our school administration and the district, but we also had to answer to Christy.

Christy, I'll point out here, was very passionate about her work, but she also carried with her an inner weariness that I wouldn't fully understand for some time. I would come to develop very conflicted feelings for Christy -- conflicted because she was a sincerely good person who cared about the people in her cohort (she, for example, took my cats in and watched them when, at a point during Institute I had nowhere else to take them), but she also tended to embody some the aspects of TFA that I would grow to despise, and also tended to play right into the negative experiences that eventually tore me apart and left me wanting to quit.

But I'm getting ahead of myself.

Back to my confession. My mother, despite having meant well, was a very controlling person who was so smothering -- and that's not even a strong enough word; she was so asphyxiating, suffocating, and quenching -- in her parenting that I think it bordered on abuse. I was not allowed to walk across the street to a friend's house -- she had to walk me. I wasn't allowed to ride bikes or go anyplace with friends if she was not there. I was not, even as a teenager, allowed to go someplace with a friend if that friend's parent wanted to drive us anywhere (she'd only let me go if she could drive me to a place and pick me up from that specific place, and that was even as a teenager). I wasn't allowed to go on school field trips unless she was allowed to go (if, heaven forbid, another parent was chosen to go instead of her, she'd keep me home that day). I had arguments with her about my lack of freedom, and her response was that was, as soon as I could demonstrate that I could escape a bear hug from my large father, she'd let me have more freedom. Even at 19 -- 19, for fuck's sake -- she sat outside a cast party I was attending and barged in to get me once she thought I'd been in there too long. She sabotaged a study abroad program I'd been accepted into in college, as well as a Disney college program I'd been accepted into, because she was absolutely sure that I wasn't ready to be on my own so far away from home, and she convinced me of such.

You get the idea.

So, anyway, when I was in grammar school my mother got tired of dealing with issues pertaining to the school (what, specifically, those issues were, I don't remember anymore, though I do know it had something to do with a spat between her and my 4th grade teacher), and so she decided to pull my younger sister and I out and home school us. Now, my mother had no college degree and no teacher training at all, but she began to act as my teacher during my 5th grade year. And she was, mind you, entirely negligent in how she went about "educating" us, but that's another story that shall be told another time.

Anyway, during kick-off Christy divided her cohort into grade levels, and then asked each grade level to write things that they remembered about that year in their own lives. What was the teacher like? What did we learn? How did we learn it? During that moment, I felt embarrassed and not quite able to write, "I stayed at home, my mom was my teacher, and she gave me teacher books to study from and then had me grade my own tests." So, instead, I made up a concoction of things that happened during my 3rd grade year and my 4th grade year and presented it as what my 5th grade year was like. It was mostly a lie, or not actually relevant to what Christy was trying to do, but it's what I had in the moment.

I'm not sure how things might have been different if I'd been honest at that point. I remember approaching Christy during a break on that day and relaying to her just how scared I was about entering my own classroom. "I'm not really sure what I'm doing," I remember telling her, thinking about the state standards that I had yet to learn, as well as the teaching methods and curricula and materials that I had yet to grasp.

She'd smiled at me. "Kate, plenty of people have taught 5th grade before." She said it in such a way as though to suggest that it wasn't really that hard, and that I'd be fine. How I was feeling, though, was that she may as well have told me, "Kate, plenty of people have changed the oil in a car before," and then left me to find the tools and instructions to do so.

As I said, kick-off lasted for a couple of days, and then I headed to my school for initiation and training.

Principal Lilian Lawrence (so not her real name) presided over new teacher meetings and school-wide expectation meetings. She introduced Amy (fellow new TFA teacher) and I to Ruby and Jordan, also TFA teachers. It's important to note here that Ruby and Jordan were known as star TFA teachers. Ruby had actually come from another state, a state in which she had gone through traditional teacher training and had been recognized with teaching awards in that state. She joined TFA simply because she believed in its mission to end educational inequity. She was an awesome teacher, and brought that to our school. The previous year, she'd been assigned to teach 2nd grade, but this year she had been "promoted" to 4th grade (and my son, an incoming 4th grader, would be in her class). Jordan, too, was being "promoted," going from a 3rd grade teacher the previous year to not only a 5th grade teacher, but the 5th grade lead teacher (and unlike Ruby, as a 2012 corps member Jordan really was only in his second year of teaching).

I thought this idea of "promotion," from a lower grade to a higher grade, was strange. We were all elementary school teachers, after all, and we were all paid based on our experience and education level -- not on what grade level we taught. Why was moving from a lower grade up to 3rd, 4th, or 5th grade deemed a "promotion?" And further, why was moving down, from 3rd, 4th or 5th grade to Kinder, 1st, or 2nd, deemed a demotion?

And it was, too. I met a 3rd grade teacher named Ken Witty (that is his real name, because I know he won't mind if I use it), who had actually been a 5th grade teacher the year before (in my classroom, no less). He didn't get along with Principal Lawrence at all, though, and she'd moved him down to 3rd grade as a result of that. I found out that if you were not well liked, or else did not perform up to expectations, you were moved down grade levels. At our school, it was common knowledge that moving up grade levels was a "promotion," and moving down grade levels was a "demotion," and it didn't take long to figure that out, either. As a 5th grade teacher, I was at the top of the proverbial food chain at that school, and it seemed so strange to me that that was the case.

I told Amy as much. During a conversation one day, I told her how I thought that it was really weird how upper grades were really treated as more important at this school, especially since fundamentals are taught in the lower grades -- fundamentals that are crucial to success in the higher grades. I asked her why she thought this was the case.

"Testing grades," she told me, without thinking about it too much. "The upper grades are the testing grades, so that's why some people think they matter more."

During that first week at school, I learned a whole lot about tests, and just how important they were. I heard about the data we'd be collecting throughout the year (Aimsweb data, Discovery Education data, Accelerated Reader data, math facts data, and Core Phonics data), and how we'd use them to prepare our students for the be-all-end-all, most-important-test-of-all-tests, the CRT (Criterion Reference Test). The CRT, taken at the end of the year, would apparently produce scores that would affect our school's star rating and, therefore, my principal's reputation. To Principal Lawrence, the CRT was everything, and tracking preparatory data until the day of that test was almost as important.

During some of the meetings that week, we discussed data collection, but I still had no idea what Aimsweb, DE, AR, math facts, Core Phonics, or any of it looked like. The strategists leading the meetings seemed to think that we all knew what they were talking about, though, and questions regarding what these were or how they were administered were met with wide eyes and gaping expressions, as though they couldn't quite believe that any qualified teacher wouldn't know what these things were already. Such expressions were immediately followed, usually, by a brief (and unhelpful, at least for me) run-through of these data-collecting systems before quickly moving on to something new. I learned to keep my mouth shut about not understanding a thing, but this also caused my anxiety levels to reach peak highs.

The data tracking was to be done damn near everywhere in the school. The bulletin board that first greeted teachers as they entered the building (near our principal's office) was reserved for teacher data, and it displayed the phrase "Data Drives Instruction" across the top. The bulletin boards that lined the halls wouldn't be reserved for student work -- they were to display data (the boards that corresponded to our classrooms were supposed to show AR data, and the other boards would show test data by grade level). And within my classroom, one of the boards needed to be devoted to data tracking as well. I had no idea how to do this, as I had no idea exactly what I was tracking or how I was going to track it.

I did my best, though. I had decided to use a Harry Potter theme in my classroom (I even bought Hogwarts House banners to hang in the classroom, and set up my desks in long rows beneath them so that I could "sort" the students on the first day of school). So, for my data tracker, I set up a a board that was vertically lined with numbers (0 - 50, in increments of 10, which was arbitrary at the time since I didn't know what I was actually tracking or how to track it), and created little silhouette witches on broomsticks to represent the students.

When Principal Lawrence came in to see how my room was coming along, she stared at the data board for a while. I don't think she was quite sure what to make of it. She really did believe in me as a new TFA teacher, though, so she didn't question it. She just looked at it. Then she turned and began to leave almost as abruptly as she'd come in, stopping to briefly comment on a stack of leveled books that sat atop my classroom bookshelf: "Oh, I'm glad you have these. You can go through them and use them for your reading groups and RTI."

I nodded enthusiastically, even though I wasn't quite sure what she meant. Luckily, she turned and brisked out of the room.

At that moment, I felt a small surge of panic. Reading groups? RTI? I knew, though experience with my son's education, that such things involved the use of centers -- which I thought were pretty standard in elementary school classrooms. But I'd asked Michaela (my CMA from Institute, remember?) about centers and how to implement them back when I was at Institute. I'd hoped for either information about a training in centers, or else that Michaela would help me out one-on-one with them. They seemed to me to involve a lot of planning and management skill, and the idea seemed overwhelming, so I wanted help with them.

But Michaela had told me, "Oh, don't worry about that. Centers are a pretty advanced classroom strategy. I wouldn't worry about using them during your first year."

Yeah. No centers during my first year, according to Michaela (who actually taught in Clark County, no less). And yet, here I was, about ready to embark as a teacher, facing the requirement that I would need to use centers so that I could implement small reading groups.

And then, along with that, was the RTI requirement. RTI stands for Response To Intervention, and the idea behind it (which I wouldn't actually learn until I took my special education class over the summer), is to provide intense reading intervention for extremely low students before referring them to the special education team for testing. It's like, if a child might qualify for special education, you've got to try to intervene first (and collect loads of data and documentation on that intervention). Classroom teachers, in Clark County, anyway, are supposed to perform this intervention for 30 minutes on a daily basis. And at my school, the process of choosing students for this intervention had nothing to do with whether they might qualify for special education; rather, we would use one specific piece of reading data, choose our six lowest kids, and form a special, 30-minute reading group that served as our "intervention" of the day.

But, again, this was something I kind of learned along the way. I had no idea what RTI was, or how to teach it (hell, I didn't even know the first thing about teaching a small reading group) at first.
I learned more about Clark County's reading framework (something I would hear about again and again and again down the road) once I attended teacher orientation at the Venetian. There were hundreds of new teachers there, all recruited to help pull Clark County out of the educational quagmire it was in, and all of us were separated for individual sessions by grade level. Over the course of the 3-day event, what I remember most was being introduced to that framework. In the framework, we were required as classroom teachers to make sure that our reading block was a certain length: About 30 minutes of whole group reading instruction, about an hour of small group instruction (complete with literacy centers), and 30 minutes of RTI. There was a specific time frame for language arts and writing, too. There were also 80 required minutes of math, and a teacher was supposed to fit science and social studies in where they could. We were taught to "integrate" those subjects -- that is, to focus specifically on reading and math, and to "teach" social studies and science within those subjects by, like, making sure our assigned readings were science-y or social studies-ish.

Aside from reading groups and RTI, I also learned what my specific school requirements would be regarding lesson plans. Each lesson had to be linked to a standard, and needed to contain all of the following: 1) the standard being addressed, 2) the daily objective, 3) the materials that would be used, 4) the "essential big question," 5) the vocabulary being taught, 6) the procedure that would be used, 7) how I would close the lesson, and 8) how I would assess the lesson. I needed all of this for each subject -- for my reading lesson, my math lesson, my language arts lesson, and my writing lesson. Further, I needed this for each of the reading group lessons I would be teaching (about 3 a day), for the RTI lesson I would be teaching, and I also needed to be explicit about my centers, and which literacy standard(s) each center was aligned to. Also, I needed to make sure that my lessons outlined which other standards (science, social studies, speaking and listening) were being addressed in these lessons.

I keep using the word "overwhelmed." It's really an understatement in terms of how I was feeling. I used Jordan's lesson plans as a template, but it helped only slightly. I didn't know yet about the resources (such as Teachers Pay Teachers) that would eventually make my life much easier.
The weeks in Vegas leading up to the first day of school culminated on our last Friday before the start of the year. In CCSD, this Friday is designated, district-wide, as a kind of "back to school" day, in which parents and families come to school to meet their teachers and see their rooms. I had spent a lot of time making my room very Harry Potter-esque, and I put on a witch's hat and played Harry Potter music in the background, but despite all of the dazzle I put into making this day a good one, I was very anxious to meet my students and their families.

In essence, I was terrified that they were going to take one step into my classroom and realize that I was not a real teacher. Part of the reason I felt this way was because I didn't feel like a real teacher, and I was not overly prepared. I greeted everyone warmly throughout the afternoon, though, and did my best to answer questions and show the students around the room. Some parents wanted to know where their child's seat was, and I patiently explained, each time, that they would be "sorted" into Houses on the first day. They looked at me skeptically, but didn't ask further about it.

One set of parents had a very high-achieving daughter, a GATE student whom they were very concerned about regarding her education (they were the parents who wanted to make sure that their child was receiving a high-quality education at all times). Though my stomach sank at this, I referred confidently to my data board and made a very bold statement: "Most of my students exceed expectations by the end of the year, so you have nothing to worry about." They left happy, of course, but this left me feeling guilty and anxiety-torn.

Other parents approached me out of concern for different reasons. Some parents confided to me that their child was very "low" academically, and wanted to know whether I could help them. I assured them that I could -- that I would approach each student individually and give her or him whatever it was they needed. Others expressed concern that their child's behavior in class -- whether they were known to be talkative or any number of things -- might keep them from excelling. I communicated confidence that I could reach each student, again, as individuals and make sure their learning environment was what it needed to be to ensure success.

Lie after lie after lie. It's not that I didn't believe in what I said, or that I didn't hope to do everything I could for my students. I just wasn't at all confident that I actually could do the things I said I would do. But it was hard enough not believing in myself -- I didn't need to start the year with parents not believing in me, either.





































Chapter 8: First Days

The night before the first day of school, I could barely sleep. My stomach was a twisted mess of knots. How on earth was I going to go to school the next morning and live up to the expectation that I would be a high-quality teacher who, as superintendent Pat Skorkowsky demanded, reached "100% of students 100% of the time, without exception, without excuses," and who, as TFA demanded, provided "all students access to an excellent education?"

Regardless of how prepared I was (or, more accurately, was not), the morning arrived like a relentless, unstoppable bulldozer, and I braced myself for its impact as I downed three cups of coffee. I'd gotten up extremely early that day, so as to take time on my appearance and complete the 30-minute drive up to the school while still arriving early enough to adequately prepare for the morning. The sun hadn't even risen as my son and I piled into the car.

Eight months ago, when I'd first heard about my acceptance into Teach For America, I had wept with joy. I had felt excitement and happiness on a level that I hadn't felt in a long, long time. Now that the proverbial "dream" was about to come true, though, I felt buried beneath the overwhelming weight of high expectations and ill preparedness. I wished I felt more ready. Was that something that would eventually come to me, the more I taught? Did I miss something at Institute, something necessary that would have prevented this feeling?

I consoled myself with the knowledge that, since it was the first week of school, I would be spending the majority of my time getting to know my students. At Institute, we'd learned lots of ice-breaking games and activities. I knew I could pull these off, and maybe after I got to know my students a bit I would feel better about my time in the classroom with them. Other teachers (such as Michaela) had told me that they spent the first two weeks doing these activities; other teachers (such as Jordan) told me that they spent no more than two days on them. I'd decided, personally, to spend one week.

This first week, then, would be devoted to that, as well as to establishing rules and procedures. At first, I'd been looking forward to using the same "stoplight" behavior management system that had worked at Flo-Jo, but I was a bit thwarted in that because my school had its own behavior management system that all teachers were expected to use. It was a version of the "stoplight" system ... but a bit different.

Honestly, it was kind of weird. Instead of the straightforward green = good, yellow = yield, and red = stop, my school insisted on a clip chart that used seven different colors. At the top, students started on "perfect pink." From there, they moved down to "blue blue" and got a first warning. After that, they moved down to "rowdy red" and got a second warning. If misbehavior continued, a student then moved down to "panic purple" and received the loss of a privilege. Then, a student moved down to "yucky yellow," which meant a phone call or parent conference, and then down to "grotesque green," which meant a time out of some sort (I think ... as I'm thinking about it now, the lower colors and their consequences are a bit hard to remember in full detail). Lastly, students were moved down to "outrageous orange," which meant that they had to visit the principal.

I personally had a desk set up at the back of the room and called it Azkaban. I planned on sending students to sit in Azkaban if need be as a form of time out. I wasn't sure that I was actually going to incorporate two warnings, loss of a privilege, and a parent conference before doing so, either.
But we'd see. Having never taught in my own classroom before, it was hard to gauge exactly how I would respond to any one thing.

Preparation that morning consisted of making sure that my sorting hat was ready to go, that my shelves and desks were neat and clean, and going over the activities and games in my lesson plan. It was kind of like rehearsing for a play -- I knew everything I needed to do and say, but there was still some anxiety over the possibility that I'd draw a blank and fail in front of my audience (in this case, my students). But I told myself that as long as I made it look like I was in control at all times, they'd believe that I was.

My son stayed in my classroom with me, helping me prepare and set up, until an all-call was made for a staff meeting before the first day of school. I thought that having him in my room in the mornings, and also having him sit quietly (he was a well-behaved nine-year-old, after all) with a book during meetings would be fine. Otherwise, if he couldn't attend meetings, surely he could stay in my classroom until it was time to line up for the day. This is what I assumed, anyway.

Turns out, it's what I assumed wrongly. Mrs. Lawrence launched a tirade, halfway between irritation and frustration, on me about how I needed to have my son in Safekey in the mornings. For those who don't know, Safekey is a babysitting service that takes place at schools. It allows parents to drop their kids off early and pick them up late at school if they need to. It is not a free service, mind you -- it's around $20 per week for mornings, and more for afternoons, which can add up quickly if you're not a wealthy person.

Needless to say, I'm not a wealthy person, and I was certainly nowhere close to wealthy at that point. I hadn't even received my first paycheck yet, and was recovering from the very expensive move I'd just completed (and was also battling new debt, as TFA provided a loan to help me get through that process). The Safekey program at my school had no discounts for teachers, either, so I was a little put out that I was essentially being forced to spend nearly $100 a month on unnecessary babysitting.
I thought it would be a reasonable option to let Brendan sit in my classroom with me while I prepared for the morning.

But Mrs. Lawrence insisted that wasn't an option. I absolutely had to register him for Safekey and take him to the cafeteria every morning to be looked after by strangers, regardless of the fact that I was in the same building. She said it wouldn't be fair to other teachers to have a child in the halls or classrooms before school.

I could have had my child at a different school. He didn't have to be there with me, but I'd thought the experience might be good for both of us. Mrs. Lawrence didn't really give a shit whether I kept Brendan at the school or not, though (until she found out that he's a stellar test taker, anyway, which came later), so she was not at all interested in negotiating her Safekey policy with me. I was decidedly unhappy about this.

But anyway, back to that first day. I met my students for the first time as they lined up outside for breakfast. At the school I taught at, each student was entitled to a free breakfast, which was to be eaten in the classroom. So the daily procedure started with meeting our students outside.
Let me preface the daily morning procedure with a few facts. First, this was to be Principal Lawrence's second year at our school. She'd been brought in to take it from a low performing school and transform it into a high performing one. One of the first changes she made was that, when students arrived in the mornings, they were not allowed to play on the playground (they used to be able to do this, under the previous principal). Instead, they were to go straight to the classroom "dot" to line up for the day. So there was a 10 to 15 minute time frame from which the gates opened and students filed in to get in line to when we started leading them inside for breakfast. During that time, students were expected to stand their classroom lines.

Breakfast was set up with two lines into the cafeteria. Students would go through the line and grab one of everything (it was all pre-packaged foods such as cinnamon rolls, coffee cakes, or little boxes of cereal) before going to class. We'd then lead our class through the halls and to the classrooms, where students would sit down, eat breakfast, and then throw their trash away in giant trash bins located in the pods. Right around finishing time, the school counselor would come on the loudspeaker to recite the Pledge of Allegiance and lead 30 seconds of silence (both required by Nevada state law), give morning announcements, and reveal the day's lunch menu. After all of this, we could begin our academic day.

My first day centered around getting to know my students. I sorted them into their Harry Potter Houses first, and only after this had been completed did I realize that it wasn't the smartest move I'd ever made. I knew nothing about these kids, and randomly assigning them to a House from which they'd likely not want to be moved before getting to know them presented a few challenges. First, somehow or another, a group of about six girls (who all happened to be friends) all wound up in Hufflepuff together. Next, a group of about five boys (who all happened to be very loud and talkative) all wound up in Gryffindor together. And so on. I continued with this original plan, though, assuring myself that, as I got to know the students more I could move them around as needed.
The second thing that I did that morning, after sorting the students, was introduce myself and attempt to learn names and something about each student. I did this by moving all of the desks out of the way and sitting in a circle on the floor. I told the students that we were going to play a name game which would involve using an adjective to describe themselves -- but the adjective had to start with the same letter as their first name.

"My name is Ms. Sirls," I began, to lead by example. "Since Ms. starts with an "m," I'm going to pick an adjective that starts with that letter. So I'll introduce myself as Musical Ms. Sirls because I like to sing and listen to music, and musicals are my favorite type of show."

While I was counting on some issues, such as shy students who didn't want to talk, I did not count on my 5th graders not knowing what an adjective was. This proved to be a major problem.
"An adjective," I tried to explain, "is a word that describes something. So you have to pick a word that describes you and use it in your introduction."

Even when they seemed to grasp, in a way, what an adjective was, there were still issues surrounding following the rules of the game. "I don't know," some of them said. "I can't think of a word that describes me." And for some of them, it took a good five minutes of gentle prodding and questioning to get them to come up with a word that described them. Some of them never did come up with a word.

Others, still, came up with a word but ignored the direction about having it start with the first letter of their first name. "I'm Nice Maria," they'd say, for example, or "I'm Cool Brian" (I didn't have any students named Maria or Brian; those were just examples of what the kids said).

After a while, I stopped trying to correct them. It didn't matter. I was getting their names and one-word descriptions of themselves, which was what was important to me.

We then played a different name game, in which a person says their name, and the person next to them says their name and the name of the person before them, and the next person then says their name and the names of the two people before them ... and so on. It gets really difficult, obviously, the further down the line you are, but I promised that I would be able to say everyone's name by the end of the game -- that I would go last and go around the entire circle and correctly state everyone's name.
I did, too. In all honesty, I surprised even myself at my ability to correctly name 30 students after only a small time in the classroom.

The day continued on this way until it was time for me to take my students to lunch. I had a 30 minute lunch break every day, and the students also had 30 minutes for lunch. But for them (again, another implementation from Principal Lawrence), they had about 25 minutes to eat (if they ate faster, they sat quietly), and then 5 minutes or so (sometimes it was closer to 7 minutes) to play outside. So, here in this elementary school environment, the students had, thus far, received 5-7 minutes of play time outside, and there was no more scheduled throughout the day.

5-7 minutes. To Principal Lawrence, play time for children was not important, not when that time could be used to teach standards and prepare for state tests. And to top it off, she was so afraid that the 5th graders would fight all recess long that she scheduled 5th grade lunches all at different times to make sure that they weren't all interacting during their one, small break a day. This upset a number of my students, as they wanted to play with their friends from other classes. I encouraged them to create a petition to take to the principal about moving 5th grade lunches so that they all occurred simultaneously. They did write a petition, too. My high-achieving GATE student drafted it and the entire class signed it. I agreed to take it to the principal, but it was to no avail. She felt very sure that allowing large numbers of 5th graders to interact on a daily basis was a very bad idea.

So things stayed the way they were in regards to lunch and recess. I usually chose to eat lunch (or not -- I didn't always eat during lunchtime) in my classroom, away from other people. As an introvert, constant interaction is particularly draining for me mentally, emotionally, and even physically, so lunch on my own was a small breath of fresh air for me every day. I'm sure that other teachers must have thought that my avoidance of the lunch room was because I was a snob of some sort (or something -- it's not unusual for there to be divides on campuses between TFA teachers and traditionally trained ones, though it's not always the case), but it was necessary for me.

My prep period -- the 50 minutes of time during which I could plan, grade, or do whatever I needed to while my students attended music, P.E., art, or library -- occurred directly after lunch. So I'd finish my lunch period and make it outside to pick up my students after their small recess period. Then I'd march them inside to whatever "special" (as we referred to the previously mentioned classes) they had that day. The students went to music, art, and library once per week, and to P.E. twice a week.
Most days, I tried to spend my prep period completing the arduous task of completing lesson plans, but there were times when I was required to attend meetings, too. There were a whole lot of meetings to attend that first year at my school. Every week, everyone was required to attend a PLC meeting in the morning (the 5th grade PLC was on Wednesdays, I think), during which we'd discuss strategies, data, new curricula, or whatever else our strategists thought we needed to discuss. These PLC meetings took the place of staff meetings, which we never had. Then, we were also required to have grade level meetings once a week (led by our team leader, Jordan), and these usually happened during prep. In the beginning, these were designed to assist us in staying on track with teaching the same standards at the same time, creating homework, analyzing data, and other such things; later on in the year, however, they turned into much-needed venting sessions.

But that came later. My first week at school seemed to be inundated with meetings, never ending lists of data I needed to produce and analyze, groups I needed to make, information I needed to gather and share, and on and on and on. I think I survived it only because I wasn't teaching any real academics that week. Balancing a heavy workload and a steady stream of increasing demands that you don't even fully understand is easier to do, I think, when you're spending class time playing games and learning names and such.

After that first week, though, things became more difficult as I tried to incorporate academic standards into my lesson plans and my classroom. I would sit up for hours analyzing the standards and figuring out how I could present them. Where would I fit language or writing into this day, or where would I fit speaking and listening standards in anywhere? Organizing my lesson plans around such questions proved daunting, and more than a few gray hairs grew from trying.

Throughout that first week, I felt like I was drowning and wouldn't ever figure "it" out. As I progressed into my second week and beyond, the waves above me became so crushing that I wasn't sure I'd ever resurface again.

Chapter 9: Survival

Principal Lawrence rarely smiled. During that first year, I don't think I ever heard her laugh. She didn't appear to know student names, nor did she care to. The one thing she did seem to care about was data, and it's one of the only things I ever heard her talk about. Even at the start of the year, when she showed us an inspirational scene from the movie Here Comes the Boom, she centered it around the importance of improving student test scores, around being those kinds of teachers who could ensure that 100% of students passed 100% of their tests 100% of the time (or at least something close to that).

There were rare times when she appeared to be lighthearted, but most of the time she presented a rather intimidating demeanor, full of frenzied anxiety, all her own and yet ready to pass on to teachers, that caused me to want to avoid her at all costs. I didn't feel comfortable around her, and most of the time felt a deep sense of anxiety when I talked to her -- anxiety that never allowed me to be myself in her presence.

Perhaps it was me. Considering, however, that other teachers felt the same anxiety and our first assistant principal left after mere weeks at the school, I don't think it was all me. I found out later (years later, when I actually talked to her about it) that our original assistant principal chose to leave shortly after the start of the school year because working with Principal Lawrence, and the associated environment, was simply too much to handle. They had very different ideas about how to run a school, how to treat teachers and students, and even how to motivate teachers and students. This assistant principal told me many stories about her few weeks at the school, but said her final straw was when she left briefly to grab a coffee from the McDonalds down the street, only to return and be written up by Mrs. Lawrence because she hadn't signed out of the building. We're talking about an educational professional here, only a few years away from retirement, written up by a younger principal for not signing out when she went to get a coffee.

So we received a new assistant principal, but she also left after a month or so. For a while, we had a couple of interim assistant principals who were kind of "subbing" in the position until a permanent one could be hired.

The office clerk (who was accused of, and later absolved of, stealing money from the school) didn't enjoy working for her. Even the night janitor used to vent to some of us teachers about her. So, although my issues with Mrs. Lawrence as a boss and leader could have had something to do with me, it would be wholly unfair and insufficient to suggest it was all to do with me. But more on that -- and her -- later.

My struggles during those first few months of teaching did not end with Mrs. Lawrence. I still struggled with understanding and covering all of the standards I was supposed to teach that year, and I struggled with preparing lesson plans that centered around them. We were required to post all lesson plans to a drive that was specific to our school (this drive was available for the school to view, and checked regularly by admin). I struggled to keep up with my grade level, who consisted of three other teachers (Jordan, of course, and also Aisha Walker, who was about to begin her first year of teaching, and Donn Gallon, who was formerly with the military and beginning a new career as a teacher). I always felt like these three had it "together" far more than I did, and I struggled to, as Christy put it, "fake it 'till you make it" so that I at least appeared that I had it "together," too.

One of the first pieces of data that we teachers needed to gather was Discovery Education data, or DE, as we called it. I didn't understand it at first, but it didn't take too long to catch on. DE was a test that students took on computers, online. Computer lab times were scheduled so that teachers could have their entire class take the test at the same time (since each of our classrooms had about four computers to share among our 30 or so students), so that data could be produced quickly and accurately. I didn't realize, as my students took it for the first time, how important this data would be. Mrs. Lawrence, and our school in general, considered DE data predictive of how our students would score on the CRT (our huge, end-of-year standardized test).

After the DE test, therefore, admin and school strategists accessed the scores and posted the data by grade level. Our 5th grade data board, then, was soon full of our DE scores. Bar graphs showed that Jordan and Aisha's classes both scored over 60% proficient, and mine and Donn's classes both scored just over 40% proficient. I looked at those scores and my heart dropped.

Jordan, though, assured me that my scores were fine. "I would almost prefer having lower scores right now," he told me. "There's more room to grow for the later tests."

It made sense, but his reasoning didn't make me feel any better. It did make me, however, more determined to make sure that our next round of DE tests showed tremendous growth from my class -- despite being the lowest percent proficient now, I vowed to be the highest by the end of the year. (And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how "teaching to the test" begins.)

There was another standardized test that we gave our students early on. It was called Aimsweb and, like DE, measured a student's level in both reading and math. There were two sections in reading -- RCBM and MAZE -- that students had to complete, and two sections in math -- MCOMP and MCAP. The RCBM test required students to read a passage for one minute, and their fluency was scored based on how far they were able to get (with minimal mistakes) during that one minute period of time. The MAZE test featured a passage with missing words, and students had three minutes to circle the appropriate word for each blank in order to demonstrate comprehension. For math, the MCOMP was an eight-minute test in which students had to demonstrate understanding of basic math operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division). The MCAP was another eight minute test designed to assess students' knowledge in other mathematical areas, such as data and measurement, fractions, and elapsed time.

We were supposed to use Aimsweb data to assign our students reading groups, and we were also supposed to use it to decide which students would be a part of our RTI group. Now, RTI was a huge deal at my school, and there was a lot of paperwork involved -- in fact, we had an entire staff development day (designated days taken by the entire district, in which students stayed home and staff came in, so that teachers could be trained in various areas) dedicated to the development of our RTI groups. RTI stands for Response to Intervention, and is supposed to be used as intensive instruction before a student is referred to special education testing.

The criteria for selecting an RTI group at our school, as I mentioned before, involved only choosing our six "lowest" scoring students on the RCBM test. After that, we were supposed to use their scores to calculate goals, and we had to set up an entire folder for each student. The folder would contain their Aimsweb data, parental consent (which needed to be sent home and returned as soon as possible) for participation in the RTI group, various other forms filled out by the parent and the teacher, and then, later, a daily log of what was taught each day during the RTI session and how the student responded to the intervention.

It was a lot to handle for someone who'd never even heard the term "RTI" before. I still, years later, don't entirely understand the dynamics of how it's often used -- there's an interesting article that explores how RTI as a requirement has fallen short of the promised results, and has not helped students in the ways it was supposed to. Looking back on my own school during my time with TFA, it always seemed as though RTI was less about intervening on behalf of low-level readers, and more about maintaining shitloads of data on students so that we could remain "compliant" with the state of Nevada's RTI requirements.

But anyway, back to my initial issues with RTI. After perusing my Aimsweb data I approached one of our strategists with the knowledge that my reading scores actually seemed pretty good, whereas my math scores were very, very low. She took a close look at the data with me, and replied that it might be a good idea to provide a math intervention group instead of a reading one. She wasn't sure if this would be all right with Mrs. Lawrence, though, so she said she would check with her and get back to me.

She never did get back to me, but in the interim I put my intervention group on hold. This proved to be detrimental later on, as I was supposed to present my RTI folders to show what I'd done about halfway through the year and, of course, I didn't have anything to show. I tried to defend the fact that this strategist had essentially told me to keep the RTI group on hold until she found out whether I could provide math instead of reading, but in response to this the strategist threw me under the bus and denied such a thing had happened. So I wound up in hot water over having no RTI data a few months into the year and shouldered it on my own.

I did start attempting to provide RTI lessons, but the truth was that I had no idea what I was doing. So some days I would gather my students around the kidney table and we would do a reader's theater script. Or, on other days, we would take turns reading from a leveled book. But I didn't know the first thing about what the group was supposed to look like and basically did the best I could.

A few months into the school year, however, I did start to learn a bit more about how reading groups and such were structured, as Mrs. Lawrence decided to send a number of us to Reading Academy. This course, which occurred once a week for about six weeks, taught us the ins and outs of literacy instruction, and it was actually helpful. It took me from a place of knowing absolutely nothing in regards to what I was doing (in terms of reading instruction, anyway) to a place of knowing at least the basics of teaching differentiated reading. During this time, however, I had to get a substitute once a week (I think I went to Reading Academy every Wednesday), which kind of staggered my week in a way that was either detrimental to my classroom or else good for my mental health (and I couldn't decide which was more likely to be true).

So, as the weeks went on and Reading Academy continued, I returned to my classroom feeling only slightly, rather than utterly hopeless when it came to reading groups and RTI. I left Reading Academy each week with great ideas, but I still struggled to utilize them in the classroom. Despite the fact that I tried, it was hard to decide which of my students needed which of the 5 main "pillars" of reading instruction (phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension -- as 5th graders, most of my students needed fluency and comprehension, and as English language learners [ELLs for short], many of them needed vocabulary, too). It was also hard to decide how to teach those things to my students, and also how to break up groups so that each student was getting exactly what he or she needed (this is what's called "differentiation," and it's required of all teachers, since classes these days are usually comprised of around 30 students who all fall on different areas along the ability spectrum). I had students with high school reading levels who needed literature circles; I had students on grade level who needed grade level material; I had students far below grade level who still needed to be exposed, according to the district, to grade level material, but with extra assistance; and I had students who were not on grade level due to a disability and needed different types of instruction and intervention. Just because I was, technically, a 5th grade teacher did not mean that I was simply teaching 5th grade -- the levels of differentiation needed in order to assure that all students were able to access the 5th grade material presented to them meant that my 5th grade curriculum needed to extend well beyond what is considered to be "5th grade material" on a daily basis.

This is the kind of thing that comes with practice, but during the first part of that first year, it was beyond hard. On many days, I felt like I was attempting an almost impossible task.
And that was just reading -- math wasn't any easier. Because of the way my day was set up -- three hours of teaching in the morning, then back-to-back lunch and prep for 80 minutes, and then a nearly two hour block of teaching in the afternoon -- I taught ELA (English and Language Arts) in the morning and math in the afternoon. My problems teaching math were very similar to the ones I faced teaching ELA; that is, I didn't know how to interpret the standards all the time or how to teach them well (this was before I had a decent grasp on how to use Curriculum Engine, and a year before it became the truly useful resource it is now).

So I often found myself using lunch and prep periods to plan for my math lesson. I would try to plan well in my lesson plans, but I always wound up panicking right before the lesson anyway, trying to figure out how to teach a specific standard.

For example, 5th grade math standard 5.NBT.B.5 (NBT standing for Numbers and Operations in Base 10) states that students will "fluently multiply multi-digit whole numbers using the standard algorithm." On the day I was to teach this standard, I would think, All right, I can do this. I know the standard algorithm!" And I would then stand in front of the class and use the standard algorithm to solve a long multiplication problem. Again and again. I'd ask various students what my next step should be and allow them to guide me, and then I'd release them to do problems in their textbook.

Later, I'd learn that appropriate elementary school instruction involves manipulatives, collaborative work among student groups, multiple avenues to the same answer, videos and music, interactive notebooks, and a number of other strategies and resources that make learning interesting and accessible to young people. During the first part of that first year, I knew none of this -- I only knew that I was to teach certain things, and my only experience teaching (in a college classroom) involved a lot of lecturing and in-depth discussion (in other words, things not always suitable for 5th graders).

Mrs. Lawrence told me this, too. After observing a science lesson in which I used a PowerPoint to introduce students to Newton's laws of motion, she commented, during our post-observation conference, that I couldn't lecture and use PowerPoint presentations the same way I did when I taught college. "The students need to talk to each other," she told me. "You need to get them working together and talking more, and you need to talk less."

The principal wasn't the only one in my classroom offering advice. The strategists -- we had three of them at our school -- were constantly in there as well, to either model a lesson or to just sit and watch, to offer me advice in terms of keeping Mrs. Lawrence happy. "Make sure you write your standards and objectives on the board," they told me. "Don't forget to re-address the standard in your closing. Make sure students know why they're learning what they're learning."

Christy popped into my classroom quite often as well, and although her first few visits consisted of watching my lessons and leaving positive sticky notes on my desk, I soon began to realize that these "visits" were more like observations. She'd come in, assess my lesson plans, talk to students (she'd ask them what they were doing, whether they knew how to do it, why they were doing it, and so forth). She'd tell me that, according to the TAL Rubric used by TFA (that I mentioned in a previous post), my students were "unruly and/or apathetic." There were too many students off-task, she said; too many of them were bored or confused, or didn't even know what the hell was going on in the lesson. I knew that I was struggling, but I honestly didn't think my classroom was that bad.

It became difficult just to get through each day. Each day that I dragged myself to work, the only thought that kept me going was the understanding that, in eight hours or so, I'd get to go home and watch Netflix with my son and drink wine. On most days, though, even that didn't happen because of how much time I spent at school trying to stay above water. I arrived at that building before the sun came up, and often didn't leave until after the sun had gone down. And all the while, I was feeling like a fake teacher, like I sucked and my students deserved so much more; I felt like, no matter how hard I tried and how much effort I put in, I was sincerely bad at what I did. I felt constantly beat down by everyone with the power to lift me up and like I just had to get out because it's hard to feel beaten and broken down every day.

My life became a cycle of drowning, then coming up for air with some great ideas in mind. These ideas would refresh me for a day or so, but I'd soon find myself sinking yet again. With 5 weeks of training, I was simply unprepared to manage my own classroom. I'd spend hours on my lesson plans, trying to figure out how to teach lessons (as I mentioned above), but also how to fit everything into each day. I had to figure out how to meaningfully assess my students. I needed weekly grades for reading, language arts, math, science, social studies, and speaking and listening, all while planning six small reading lessons for my reading groups, making sure I had meaningful centers for my other students to be working on during those small groups, and an intensive RTI lesson. It was so much -- too much -- and I had no idea how to juggle it. Despite trying, my proverbial balls kept dropping, and it became harder and harder to pick them back up again. Most days, I felt like I was failing at everything. Further, because TFA sets itself up on the idea that their teachers are all superstars, I felt like an isolated failure. I couldn't figure out what was wrong with me. Was I not smart enough, not adamant enough, not persistent enough, or did I not work hard enough? The waves swallowing me were laden with guilt, shame, and extreme burnout.

And in the midst of all of this, I was also a full time graduate student at UNLV. TFA, as I've mentioned before, sets its corps members up with a local university so that each person is earning a master's degree in education while they're completing their two years of teaching with the corps. This first semester, as I was beginning teaching, I had a class in literacy assessment and a class in TEFL (teaching English as a foreign language). This, of course, made it even harder to keep up and stay afloat, as any tiny bit of free time I managed to find went straight to my graduate coursework. I attended classes twice a week, and they began at 4:30. Since work at my school ended at 3:30, I would often have to drive straight from work (with my son, no less) in heavy traffic to the university, where I would spend the next few hours in class before returning home and collapsing in exhaustion.

But my never ending exhaustion wasn't just due to admin and strategists and TFA and teaching and planning and grading and grad school and whatnot ... it was, at times, the students as well. My class was filled to the brim with various personalities, some of which I meshed with naturally, and others I did not. I cared about each of my students as individuals, but some of them were certainly more challenging than others, and for different reasons. Some of them would shut down on most days because of personal issues, and would not talk or respond to me. Others lived in poverty and dealt with hunger, or their electricity had been turned off, or they wore the same outfit all week long or, as in the case of one boy, would fall asleep in class because his brothers stole the covers on their shared mattress all night long. Others, still, did not know how to handle anger, and they'd explode in class.

For example, one boy responded to a disagreement with another student by breaking a pencil, and when I quickly enforced that breaking items was never appropriate, he responded by calling me a stupid bitch.

Not fun. Not easy.

I did consider quitting. It's possible, I think, that I considered quitting at some point at least every day. At one point, however, I drove by a branch of the bank that I'd worked for in California, and I immediately felt a newfound sense of determination that kept me going despite my inner turmoil. I might have been miserable each day in my new work -- I might have been completely overwhelmed and broken down all the time -- but at least I was miserable with a salary, I reasoned. At least I was miserable with a dependable paycheck. At least I was miserable with benefits that covered my insulin and thyroid medication. At least I was miserable with a set schedule that granted me weekends and holidays off (basically, the same schedule as my son, which was no small thing). No matter what was going on, I told myself, I was better off now than I had been before.

As much as I told myself this, I started to grow more depressed by the day. I retreated into myself and became quiet during meetings and such, hoping not to be noticed or asked questions or talked to. I noticed negative changes in my health, too -- my glucose levels (I am a Type 1 diabetic) were consistently high, and this led to extreme lethargy (which, I'm sure, led to even poorer attempts at teaching). I had consistent urinary tract infections, too, which were so uncomfortable that it was difficult for me to stand let alone teach.

I began to wonder if I'd ever make it to winter break, the two weeks of pure bliss that I would have off of work at the end of December. I'd enjoyed Halloween with my students (we had a costume party in the classroom, complete with cupcakes that had previously been forbidden by Mrs. Lawrence), and we'd made fun crafts for Thanksgiving (I spent most of a day letting my students complete those due to a urinary tract infection that kept me off of my feet), but it was the winter holidays that I was looking forward to the most -- and it was mostly because of those two weeks off.

Somehow, winter break arrived. On the last day of school before the break, I felt so excited to leave that building I could hardly contain myself. I knew that I would have to do some work over winter break -- there was lots of planning and grading to do, and I needed to work on organizing my reading groups -- but in that moment I had two weeks ahead of me to worry about it, and I knew that I could take at least the next few days to simply relax. Jordan was excited, too; as well as he hid it during the school year, I could tell that he was happy and relieved to have made it to winter break. I saw him after school and he wrapped me in a huge hug, lifting me off of the floor, proclaiming, "We did it!"
We had done it, I realized. I'd made it through my first few months of teaching, my first semester at UNLV, and the first segment of my Teach For America commitment. And, although the thought of returning in January was enough to cause mild panic attacks, all that was on my mind that particular afternoon were the two weeks ahead of me ... two weeks, I thought, to regroup and hopefully gain some of my sanity back.